Chapter Four: Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Federal Sentencing Today
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Fair sentencing is individualized sentencing. Unwarranted disparity is defined as different treatment of individual offenders who are similar in relevant ways, or similar treatment of individual offenders who differ in characteristics that are relevant to the purposes of sentencing. Membership in a particular demographic group is not relevant to the purposes of sentencing, and there is no reason to expect—and some might argue no to reason to care—if the average sentence of different demographic groups are the same or different. As long as the individuals in each group are treated fairly, average group differences simply reflect differences in the characteristics of the individuals who comprise each group. Group disparity is not necessarily unwarranted disparity.
منابع مشابه
Thirty Years of Sentencing Reform: The Quest for a Racially Neutral Sentencing Process
As we approach the 21st century, the issue of racial discrimination in sentencing continues to evoke controversy and spark debate. Some researchers contend that crimes by racial minorities are punished more harshly than similar crimes by equally culpable whites; others argue that racial disparities in sentence severity reflect differences in crime seriousness, prior criminal record, and other l...
متن کاملAssessing Potential Sources of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Care: The Clinical Encounter
Previous chapters have assessed the extent of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare, and have identified potential sources of these disparities. Disparities are found to arise from an historic and social context in which racial and ethnic minorities received inferior healthcare, reflecting broader socioeconomic disadvantage among minorities and societal discrimination. When seen by a heal...
متن کاملRacial Disparities in Federal Sentencing: A Quantile Regression Approach PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE PLEASE DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 explicitly prohibits the use of demographic characteristics in determining prison sentence, yet researchers continue to find evidence of disparity in sentences on the basis of race, ethnicity and gender. We employ a quantile regression technique that estimates the black-white sentencing gap across the entire sentencing distribution, rather than only at the mean...
متن کاملJudicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions∗
Racial and gender disparities are prevalent in the criminal justice system, but the sources of these disparities remain largely unknown. This paper investigates whether judge political affiliation contributes to these disparities using data on over 500,000 federal defendants linked to sentencing judge. Exploiting random case assignment, we find that Republican appointed judges sentence black de...
متن کاملGender, Race, and Sentencing
Race and gender pose empirical and policy problems that are both similar and different for the U.S. criminal justice system. They are similar in that blacks and women occupy subordinate social and economic positions in American life, and their interests are less likely to be represented in the justice system than are those of white men. They are different in that blacks are overrepresented in a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004